pediatric patient with strep

make it personal, talk about strength and weakness, feelings, experience please see rubric for grading

NSG 5441 Reflection Assignment/Discussion

Students will post reflection assignments in Weeks 3, 7 and 10. Students should reflect on their clinical experiences, offering clinical explanations, self-reflection, and information to share with your peers regarding what you have learned. These assignments will be in discussion format, and will require peer feedback. Initial reflection posts are due on Day 3 at 11:59 pm ET, with peer responses due on Day 7 at 11:59 pm ET. 

Rubric for a Reflective Discussion

Criterion

(points possible)

Exceeds expectations

Meets expectations

Needs Improvement to Meet Expectations

Does not meet expectation

Score and comments

Description of the Experience (10)

10

9

8

≤7

 

Post provides a detailed description of the learning experience in a clear, succinct, organized, logical manner and identifies and describes significant aspects of the learning.

Post provides adequate description of the learning experience and identifies and describes significant aspects of the experience in a clear, organized, logical manner.

Post provides a description of the learning experience with a few gaps in detail that impact clarity; at least one significant aspect of the experience is identified.

Post provides description of the learning experience is vague or disorganized OR a significant aspect of the learning experience is not clearly identified.

Description of Thoughts and Feelings (10)

10

9

8

≤7

 

Post describes a full range (i.e., positive and negative) of thoughts and feelings and how they persist or change throughout the learning experience.

Post describes several positive and negative thoughts and feelings and how they persist or change throughout the learning experience.

Post describes a thought and feeling associated with specific aspects of the learning experience.

Post superficially describes a thought or feeling associated with specific aspects of the learning experience.

Evaluation (20)

20

18

16

≤15

 

Post includes exploration of how well the experience went, incorporating the on-going impact of various thoughts and feelings identified making specific connections to the overall experience AND includes a detailed discussion of own strengths and weaknesses and how they impacted the experience

Post includes discussion of how well the experience went, incorporating the on-going impact of thoughts and feelings AND discussion of own strengths and weaknesses and how they impacted the overall experience.

Post identifies how well the experience went, incorporating the impact of thoughts or feelings AND identification of own strength and weakness impacting the experience.

Post identifies how well the experience went but with minimal connection with thoughts or feelings to the overall experience OR fails to include identification of own strength or weakness in the experience.

Analysis (20)

20

18

16

≤15

 

Post includes self-reflection and discussion of possible rationales for why the experience went the way it did; includes though exploration of a wide variety of factors (i.e., positive and negative) that may have contributed to the experience; Post includes exploration of other possible interpretations. 

Post includes self-reflection and discussion of possible rationales for why the experience went the way it did; includes discussion of several factors (i.e., positive and negative) that may have contributed to the experience; Post includes limited discussion of other possible interpretations. 

Post includes self-reflection and discussion of at least one possible rationale for why the experience went the way it did.

Post includes minimal self-reflection. 

Conclusions/Learning (15)

10

13.5

12

≤11.25

 

Learning and application to a variety of future situations is clearly and thoroughly identified and discussed.

Learning and application to future situations is clearly identified and discussed.

Learning and application to a future situation is clearly identified with minimal discussion.

Learning is not clearly identified or discussed and there is failure to identify how learning can be applied in future situations.

Action Plan (10)

10

8

6

≤4

 

Post identifies specific actions to be taken to support learning and a detailed strategy for completion with specific resources identified.

Post identifies specific actions steps to be taken to support learning and identifies a timeline for completion.

Post identifies a specific action to be taken to support learning but no time frame identified.

Action plan identified is broad and nonspecific.

Legibility, Grammar & Spelling (5)

5

4.5

4

≤3.5

 

 

Post has no errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation that distract the reader from the content.

Post has only minor errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation that do not distract the reader from the content.

Post has several errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation that distract the reader from the content.

Post has many errors in spelling, word usage, sentence structure, grammar, or punctuation that distract the reader from the content.

Peer Discussion (10)

10

5

0

 

 

 

Posts thoughtful, robust response to 2 peers by Day 7 deadline.

Posts thoughtful, robust response to 1 peer by Day 7 deadline.

No responses to peers by Day 7 deadline.

 

 

Search entries or author

"

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

Pediatric patient with strep 1

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

Pediatric patient with strep 2
Pediatric patient with strep 3